Profit alone is not a good metric for tracking your innovation services company’s performance. Profit is of course what you can spend or re-invest in your business, so it matters a great deal, but it doesn’t measure your success in running the business.
Consider these three possible ways of generating $500,000 of profit:
- $10M revenue with 5% profit margin
- $5M revenue with 10% profit margin
- $2.5M revenue with 20% profit margin
Each company generates the same $500,000 profit, so the results look identical by that measure. But if you look at profit margin, or the ratio of profit to revenue, the smaller company is more successful. When you consider some critical business measures, the 20% profit margin indicates stronger performance than the results shown by the larger companies.
One aspect of innovation services firms is their revenue is linear relative to the number of their employees. This reality has implications for profit sharing. In the example above, if the companies are in a position to distribute earnings, then the total profit to be distributed to owners would be the same. If, however, employees are included in the profit sharing scheme, then the $500,000 of earnings in the $10M firm will be much more thinly spread, both for employees and owners, than in the $2.5M firm, since there are likely four times as many employees in the company with the larger revenue.
In addition, the company with the 20% margin is in a much better position when times get tough. Profit margin is the first line of defense in your financial buffer.
Profit alone doesn’t tell you as much as profit margin.
I see profit margin as the single best metric to gauge a company’s overall performance. To have a high margin requires you:
- can generate a large amount of revenue per employee
- don’t need to pay higher than market rates for employees
- can properly manage fixed costs
These factors correspond directly to the top-level elements of a profit and loss statement (revenue, cost of people, expenses). What makes profit margin such a useful measure is how it rolls up all the factors critical to your business into one single, powerful metric. To achieve high margins, you need to:
- have a compelling value proposition
- be able to charge market rates
- keep your makers busy
- effectively market your services
- have a good reputation
- produce a quality product without a lot of rework
- have a high ratio of people producing to people supporting
- have a company which attracts and keeps the best people
- not pay more for rent, utilities, services, etc, than is necessary
- efficiently execute your business processes
Profit margin combines a lot of important elements into a single metric — it’s a simple way for everyone to keep track of how well the company is doing. Of course if profit margin tells you the company is not doing well, then you need to dig deeper to understand why, since profit margin is a composite metric.
Education
I periodically offer a short course on the economics of Atomic Object for our employees and interns. The “lecture” part of the course covers basic financial terms and concepts. The “lab assignments” involve playing what-if games with a P&L model of the company.
In addition to the course, I always review what I call the fundamental financial equation of our business at each quarterly company meeting. (Actually, I skipped it once and several long-time atoms pointed it out to me as a mistake.) The fundamental equation of our business relates profit to revenue and costs. You can get into complicated accounting concepts pretty easily when you start talking about how to measure profits, which sort of profit, etc. I don’t think any of that’s necessary for basic understanding of company economics.
The simple relationship I use is nothing more than the top-level components of a Profit & Loss statement:
profit = revenue – cost of people – expenses
Though simple, it’s important to review when talking about profit sharing, as it shows the inputs to our profit sharing calculation. I also describe how profit margin is a vital metric we watch closely.
I believe the company runs more smoothly, harmoniously, and profitably if everyone understands the financial dynamics of our business.
- Attention: Spending Your Most Valuable Currency - February 10, 2022
- Slicing the Revenue Pie in a Multi-Stakeholder Company - July 30, 2021
- Commercial versus Existential Purpose - July 19, 2021
- How I Misunderstood Mentorship and Benefited Anyway - June 16, 2021
- Sabbath Sundays and Slow Mondays - June 4, 2021
Scott
June 22, 2011Good points, Carl. I might take it a meta-step further and say that profit margin alone is not always the best measure of success. You must also consider what margins your competition or industry are experiencing. A 5% margin in the software industry is probably pretty lousy, but may be above average if you are a gas station owner.
Carl Erickson
June 23, 2011Great point, Scott. It only makes sense to compare within your industry.
I’ve got a post nearly ready that has some interesting data about margins in the custom software development industry.
Patrick Foley
June 23, 2011> it’s important to review when talking about profit sharing
Really good point – companies of all sizes create profit sharing plans purportedly to incentivize employees – yet how companies many really explain to those employees what numbers they need to drive for the company if they want their personal share of profits to increase?
Anonymous
June 28, 2011Probably not so many? It’s easy to forget what your employees don’t know.
Just as an aside, I see profit sharing more as a just reward or logical consequence for our collective success than a targeted incentive program.
There are many things that could be done in the short term to swing the quarter’s profit which would actually hurt profitability in the long run. Our values and action support long-term profitability — profit sharing is a result of that.
The profitability of software development firms varies by size | Great Not Big
June 30, 2011[…] small firms, and for this to be reflected in profit margin (a more important metric than profit, I’ve argued). My selected BizMiner reports include EBITDA data, so I used it as the measure of profit and […]
A process snapshot: Health insurance shopping | Atomic Spin
December 8, 2011[…] Our Atoms know a lot about how the company is run and how it’s doing financially. One way we strengthen our bottom line is by doing things like containing costs. But, we also want to offer sufficient coverage to protect […]
Adrian
December 4, 2013Hi Carl,
Very good article. I’ve been trying to find out why the holy cow of margin is held above profit, and you’ve explained this viewpoint well. However your title to your blog was Profit Margin matters more than Profit. Yet the example you gave was three companies that made exactly the same profit, and the only difference to choose from were the profit margins. If the profit margin actually trumps profit, then a higher profit margin is more desirable regardless of the actual profit. The answer I’m really looking to understand is which is better:
An 80% margin on 100 (revenue, pick any currency you like)
Or a 30% margin on 400 (revenue)
This is regarding a major component within a company rather than the total company margin average. In both cases the investment would be the same.
Obviously the second example offers an additional 50% profit for the investment. With a major floated company, would executives reject such a radical strategy due to the erosion of their Profit Margin metric. Do you think this indicator is so ingrained into the psyche of major investors that it would make such a course of action impossible to be taken seriously?
Thank you for your advice.
Adrian.
GreatNotBig
December 4, 2013Adrian, Glad you found it helpful. I think the answer to this question could be very different in a product company (which it sounds like you’re describing). It could also be very different if the company is sensitive to erosion of margin because of industry analyst expectations (assuming publicly traded). So I’m afraid I can’t offer you much. If 400 units of revenue require 4x the work and risk of 100 units, as they do in a service company like mine, then I’d go for the smaller revenue. But if you can have 4x revenue by just running the machine longer to produce more widgets, I’d go for the 400 case.